Available 24/7 | Free Consultation

A Pennsylvania Guide to Self-Driving Cars, Your Rights, and What’s Next

Last Updated: July 21, 2026

|

Written By:    Attorney Michael L. Saile

Written By:

  Attorney Michael L. Saile

As technology continues to advance, self-driving cars are becoming an increasingly popular form of transportation. Whether it is Waymo or personal vehicles with Driver Assistance Systems, many people who use these modes of travel may be unaware of their rights, especially in the event of an accident.

In this article, we will examine the most common questions surrounding self-driving cars in Pennsylvania, including what qualifies as an autonomous vehicle, how safe these cars are, and who is liable in a crash. Contact Cordisco & Saile, LLC today to speak with our legal team about any further questions you may have.

Pennsylvania’s Roads Are Entering the Driverless Vehicle Era

Self-driving technology is no longer a futuristic concept. In 2025, China and the United States saw private robotaxi fleets more than double, reaching about 8,000 vehicles operating across more than two dozen major cities. Waymo, in particular, offers its self-driving taxi services across more than 1,400 square miles in 11 cities in the United States. From 2015 to 2020 alone, the self-driving vehicle industry created more than 1,900 jobs in Western Pennsylvania. However, even with an ever-increasing number of autonomous cars and expanding job markets, there is ongoing debate about their safety and reliability. This is especially relevant to accident claims and to a self-driving vehicle’s impact on insurance and liability.

What Counts as a Self-Driving Car?

Autonomous vehicles differ from manual or automatic vehicles in that they take over all driving functions, including steering, braking, and navigation, without human input. They are also distinct from vehicles with driver-assistance systems, which still require partial driver support, with the driver remaining alert and engaged at all times.

There are several misconceptions about vehicles marketed as “self-driving.” For one, fully autonomous vehicles are currently only available for commercial use. Cars labeled as self-driving in the consumer market are those with driver-assistance systems, including Tesla Autopilot, GM Super Cruise, and Nissan ProPILOT.

Similarly, it is false that self-driving cars are accident-proof. While AI-driven systems excel at reducing human errors, such as fatigue and distracted driving, they can still cause crashes. This means that when evaluating liability in a collision, insurers will look at the type of self-driving vehicle and whether the human driver or the automated system was in control.

SAE Levels of Vehicle Automation and Liability

The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) levels of driving automation provide the industry-standard classifications for the various levels of automation. These indicate the level of control a vehicle has, ranging from no automation to fully autonomous driving. As levels increase, the driver’s role shifts from full control to supervision, and to minimal or no involvement at the highest levels.

Lower levels require constant attention, while advanced systems can handle most driving tasks. For example, think of the difference between a Tesla and a Waymo. These levels also affect safety and legal liability. Insurers and courts will use them to help determine whether the driver or the manufacturer is accountable in the event of a crash or system failure.

Where Does Pennsylvania Stand on Self-Driving Cars in 2026?

Currently, Pennsylvania takes a strict, highly regulated approach to self-driving cars, focusing on safety and certification. Under Act 130 and PennDOT’s Publication 950 guidelines, Pennsylvania allows certified companies to operate autonomous vehicles and commercial trucks without a human safety driver or remotely. To be certified, companies must submit stringent safety management plans to the state. PennDOT classifies certification into three categories: Highly Automated Vehicle driver, fully driverless, and remotely operated. Pennsylvania is also developing PennSTART, a 100-acre closed-loop testing ground in Westmoreland County. Supported by PennDOT and Carnegie Mellon University, this area is designed to mimic real-world regional terrain and offers valuable safety training for first responders. However, the rapid advances in self-driving cars may be creating gaps in the state’s existing legal frameworks. For example, if a driverless car crashes, responsibility shifts away from a human driver, but courts still rely on traditional frameworks such as negligence and product liability, which were not designed for real-time AI decisions.

Are Self-Driving Cars Actually Safer Than Human Drivers?

There continues to be a wide range of narratives surrounding self-driving cars and their safety. According to the Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, Waymo has shown an 85% decrease in injury crash rates compared to human drivers.  While advancements in technology may lead to a significantly lower risk of collisions, these vehicles are not foolproof. For instance, studies show that 62% of autonomous vehicle crashes were rear-end collisions in which the self-driving car was struck by another vehicle. This may indicate a negative correlation between certain types of collisions and the coexistence of self-driving and human-operated vehicles on the roads.

Who Is Responsible When a Self-Driving Car Causes a Crash?

When a self-driving vehicle causes an accident, liability will depend on several factors. For one, the type of self-driving vehicle plays a significant role in determining fault. While autonomous vehicles fully control their systems, vehicles with driver assistance still require a human to provide partial support.

If the car has a driver assistance system that still requires a person to operate it in part, insurers may assign fault to that individual for contributing to the accident through negligent practices. However, because autonomous vehicles operate without a driver, an accident caused by an AI malfunction or system defect will likely fall on the manufacturer or software developer.

What Does This Mean for Personal Injury Cases?

Due to differences in liability, autonomous vehicle accidents could change how injury claims are investigated. Traditional car crash claims focus on identifying the negligent driver. With autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles, insurers must ask questions such as:

  • Was the human supposed to be in control?
  • Did the system fail to detect or respond correctly?
  • Was the software behaving as designed?
  • Was the vehicle properly maintained and up to date?

The types of evidence in these cases can also vary. Instead of witness statements and phone records, an attorney may focus on collecting vehicle data, software records, and technical evidence.

These cases can be more challenging for claimants because they require a greater understanding of complex evidence and its interpretation. Fortunately, many attorneys have adapted their skill sets and knowledge to the ever-evolving legal landscape surrounding self-driving car accidents.

What Evidence Matters Most After a Self-Driving Car Accident?

Because car accident claims involving self-driving vehicles demand a different set of evidence, attorneys and insurers will have to focus on electronic evidence. This can include:

  • Event data recorder information
  • Autonomous system logs
  • Sensor data from cameras
  • GPS and telematics records
  • Fleet or remote operation logs

Physical evidence like vehicle damage, skid marks, and road conditions will still play a role. However, it will not, on its own, be sufficient to explain how the collision occurred.

Accident reconstructionists focus on internal systems in these cases rather than witnesses, road conditions, and other external factors. They may analyze how a vehicle’s AI perceived its environment, the decisions it made, and whether those decisions were appropriate for the situation.

The digital data in these vehicles is mostly controlled by manufacturers or fleet operators. As a result, this information can be overwritten, risking the erasure of crucial evidence. Therefore, if you are involved in a crash with a self-driving car, it is imperative to immediately secure an attorney who can take action to prevent the loss of evidence.

Recently injured in an accident?

Get legal help from a team that will never stop fighting for you.

What Laws Still Need To Change in Pennsylvania?

Pennsylvania made significant strides in the autonomous vehicle industry with Act 130 of 2022, which gave PennDOT authority to oversee and certify highly automated vehicles for testing and deployment. However, the state’s current legal framework is built on assumptions about human error, complicating cases without drivers. As autonomous vehicles become more common, especially in the consumer space, lawmakers, insurers, and courts alike need to understand the key elements of these cases, including system malfunctions and internal defects. Insurance laws also need updates because current systems assume a human driver, while autonomous vehicles shift liability toward companies and product liability coverage. Overall, the world of autonomous vehicles is evolving constantly and there is plenty of room for change and improvement.

What Does the Future of Self-Driving Vehicles Look Like in Pennsylvania?

Self-driving vehicles in Pennsylvania are becoming increasingly common, but they are unlikely to replace human-controlled driving anytime soon. Along with this, lawmakers must continue conversations about liability and how it changes when a crash involves autonomous vehicles. Senator Ted Cruz recently spoke at a hearing on autonomous vehicles, acknowledging that 94% of all traffic crashes are caused by human error. Self-driving cars may help reduce behaviors that lead to these incidents, such as texting while driving, fatigue, and speeding. The hope is that as these technologies advance, Pennsylvania roads can become a safer place for drivers, passengers, and pedestrians alike.

Cordisco & Saile’s Commitment to Pennsylvania Drivers and Accident Victims

At Cordisco & Saile, our compassionate and highly knowledgeable legal team helps clients navigate complex motor vehicle accident claims. We place a heavy emphasis on early investigations and evidence collection, especially when advanced technology is involved.

Our attorneys are committed to protecting injured Pennsylvanians as transportation technology evolves. If you or your loved one has been injured in a self-driving vehicle crash, do not wait to get the help you deserve.

Learn More About Your Rights as a Passenger in an Autonomous Vehicle

As self-driving vehicles become more prevalent, so do conversations surrounding their safety, efficiency, and role in daily life. Our legal team stays up to date with the latest technological developments in autonomous driving. We are fully prepared to take on your case from start to finish.

Our Pennsylvania car accident attorneys are highly skilled in handling even the most intricate car wreck cases. Get started with a free consultation today by calling 215-642-2335. Find out what our team can do for you and your self-driving accident case.

Contact Us For
Your FREE Case Evaluation

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Sign up for newsletter
Related Posts
Contact Us Today

Please fill out the quick contact form below for a fast and free case consultation.
We will contact you within 24 hours!

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Sign up for newsletter
Team Photo of Attorneys at Cordisco and Saile